Legal Opinion

Scottsdale Insurance v. MV Transportation

California Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2005No. S123766PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*649Opinion

BAXTER, J.

May a commercial general liability (CGL) insurer obtain reimbursement of its expenses of defending its insured against a third party lawsuit, when it is ultimately determined, as a matter of law, that the policy never afforded any potential for coverage, and that a duty to defend thus never arose? Where, as here, the insurer properly reserved its right to such reimbursement, we conclude that the answer is “yes.”

Defendant MV Transportation (MV) was sued by a third party (third party action). Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company (Scottsdale) advanced the costs of defending…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. MV TRANSP.California Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API