Legal Opinion

United States v. Austin

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1938No. 9294Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendant to suppress and return certain evidence alleged to have been illegally obtained.

The testimony shows that two agents of the Federal Alcohol Tax Unit had received information that certain premises located in Wilkes-Barre, Pa., were being used as a distribution point for tax unpaid liquors. On June 23, 1936, the agents saw an automobile in front of the premises. This car was operated by the defendant, who was known to them to have been engaged in the illegal liquor trade. While the agents were observing the car, another person came out of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Husty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Hilt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926
  3. Rodriguez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API