Legal Opinion
Seavey v. Korte
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 5, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward H. Lehner, J.
The prime issue presented herein is whether service of a supplemental summons and amended complaint is validly made upon an added party when served without prior court approval, but with the consent of all existing parties.
Before me is a motion by plaintiffs in action No. 1 authorizing service of a supplemental summons and amended complaint upon Jeep Corporation, Jeep Eagle Corporation, American Motors Corporation, Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Financial Corporation (jointly referred to as Chrysler), and a cross motion by the Chrysler defendants for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Abramovich v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Nishman v. De MarcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Sherlock v. ManwarenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Catanese v. LipschitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- McDaniel v. Clarkstown Central District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Seavey v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996