Legal Opinion

Township of Dayton v. Rounds

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Tuscola Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Both of these cases are suits to recover upon bounty bonds, issued by the township of Dayton in December, 1863, payable February 10, 1865, and. within the terms of the enabling act of February 5, 1864.

*83By the first section of that act it was declared that these bonds “shall be a valid and lawful claim against the township, county or city having voted, raised, hired, authorized or issued the same, and shall be paid in the same manner as the ordinary township, county or city expenses are paid.” — Comp. L. 1871, § 927.

By the fourth section it is provided that “ the claims and liabilities herein…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Martin v. Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. People ex rel. Anderson v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Township of Marathon v. Township of OregonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  4. People ex rel. Board of Supervisors v. Townships of Porter & CalvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McBride v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. City of Detroit v. Michigan Paving Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Byles v. Township of GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. McArthur v. Township of DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Sanford v. PortsmouthU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API