Legal Opinion

Farrington v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 7, 1944PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEBRING, J.:

Elmer J. Farrington sued Frank B. Webster at law to recover damages for an alleged breach of a parol contract of employment. From the declaration in the case it appears that Webster owned and maintained a home at St. Peters-burg, Florida. He was in ill health and lived alone. Having no one to attend him, Webster proposed to Mr. Farrington that he and Mrs. Farrington move into the Webster home and there render such joint services as should be required in caring for him as long as he lived. As a consideration for the service to be rendered, Webster agreed to continue in effect a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Catlett v. Chestnut, as Exr.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Hodges v. A. P. Fries & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1894
  3. Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  4. Vaughan's Seed Store v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  5. Porter v. . DunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Miller v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Estate of GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Sharick v. Southeastern University of Health Sciences, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Asgrow-Kilgore Co. v. Mulford Hickerson Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1974
  5. Rutig v. Lake Jem Land Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API