Caminiti v. Boyle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, J.
Facts of Case
This action was commenced by a petition filed in this court seeking a writ of mandamus directed to the Commissioner of Public Lands and the State Treasurer.1 Petitioners ask us to declare unconstitutional the state statute (RCW 79.90.105) which allows owners of residential property abutting state-owned tidelands and shorelands to install and maintain private recreational docks on such lands without payment to the State. We concluded that the petition met the necessary criteria for retention by this court and retained original jurisdiction.2 Having now considered the parties'…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eisenbach v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Port of Seattle v. Oregon & Washington RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BraymanWashington Supreme Court · 1988
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.