Legal Opinion

Harwell Motor Co. v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 16, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.

This is an appeal by the Harwell Motor Company, Inc., from a decree of the Chancery Court of Davidson County, holding that a contract whereby the Motor Company sold Leland H. Cunningham a Ford automobile should be rescinded on account of the minority of Cunningham at the time of the making, and that Cunningham should recover of the Motor Company the consideration paid under the contract. The original bill, filed by Cunningham against the Motor Company, sought rescission of a contract of sale of a Ford automobile and recovery of the purchase price, upon the ground Cunningham was a minor at the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tuck Ex Rel. Latham v. PayneTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Human v. HartsellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  3. Wheaton v. EastTennessee Supreme Court · 1833

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vinson v. MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Bronx Savings Bank v. ConduffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Doe v. PirainoDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
  4. Ingram v. Neutron Holdings, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API