Legal Opinion

People v. Marino

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 3, 2010No. 2-08-0242 RelPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLAREN

Joseph Marino appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his petition under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (Act) (725 ILCS 5/122—1 et seq. (West 2006)). The trial court found that the petition was untimely filed and that, because a discovery rule does not apply to postconviction actions, the late discovery of a claim that is not based on a change of law does not permit late filing under section 122—1(c) of the Act (725 ILCS 5/122—1(c) (West 2006)). We disagree that the late discovery of a preexisting claim absolutely precludes a defendant from filing a petition after the statutory deadline.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. BoclairIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. PendletonIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. WhitfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. RissleyIllinois Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MarinoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API