Pool v. VanRheen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RHOADES, Senior District Judge.
Vera Pool appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendants on: (1) her fourth claim for relief against all remaining Defendants1 for retaliation against Pool’s exercise of her constitutionally protected right to free speech under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and (2) her eleventh claim for relief against Defendant Multnomah County for retaliation under Oregon Revised Statutes § 659.030A(l)(f).2 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.
I. Background
Vera Pool, an African American woman, began working as a corrections…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rankin v. McPhersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Board of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. v. UmbehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- John R. Ulrich, Jr., M.D. v. City and County of San Francisco Laguna Honda Hospital Maria v. Rivero, M.D. Theresa Berta, M.D. Melissa Welch, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Annette Thomas v. City of Beaverton Linda Adlard Sandra MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Alpha Energy Savers, Inc., an Oregon Corporation Robert Obrist v. Diane Hansen Multnomah County Judy SwendsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Lindsey v. Clatskanie People's Utility DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Pool v. VanrheenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.