Legal Opinion

Diaz v. City of Plantation, Fla.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided September 18, 2006No. 05-60757-CIVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

URSULA UNGARO-BENAGES, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed March 16, 2006. (DE 43.) The Defendant filed its response on March 31, 2006 to which Plaintiffs replied on April 10, 2006. Also before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed March 16, 2006. (DE 49.) Plaintiffs filed their response on March 30, 2006 to which Defendant replied on April 10, 2006. The matters are ripe for disposition.

THE…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  5. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huff v. DeKalb County, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Huff v. DeKalb County, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Strzalkowski v. Mary Ann TownshipDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API