Legal Opinion

Bristor v. Bristor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1883No. 10,943PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Erom the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— Esther A. Bristor, the appellee, inherited-from her father in common with her brother, John Kellum,. several parcels of real property; in December, 1846, an agreement of partition was made allotting to her a lot in Indianapolis ; in execution of this agreement a deed was executed by Kellum, but instead of making it to the appellee it was made to herself and her husband; the sole reason for so-writing the deed was the statement of the justice by whom-, it was drawn that this was the only legal form in which it could be made. The husband throughout his life spoke of the property as belonging…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brookville National Bank v. KimbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Hileman v. HilemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Garner v. GravesIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Jacobs v. HeslerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Andrews v. Huckabee's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bartrom v. Adjustment Bureau, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Armacost v. LindleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Denny v. DennyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Crowley v. CrowleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Bristor v. BristorIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API