Legal Opinion

McNeill v. . Suggs

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 24, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Taking, receiving, reserving, or charging a greater rate of interest than six per cent, either before or after the interest may accrue, when knowingly done, works a forfeiture of the whole interest; and if a person pays an unlawful rate of .interest, he or his legal representative may, by suit in a court of competent jurisdiction, recover twice the amount of interest paid. C. S., 2306; Ragan v. Stephens, 178 N. C., 101.

The statute (C. S., 2306), formerly contained a proviso that an action to enforce the penalty should be commenced within two years from the time the usurious-transaction…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BurnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Tillery v. Whiteville Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Roberts v. Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Tayloe v. Parker.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Burnett v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marshall Motor Co. v. Universal Credit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Clark v. Hood System Industrial Bank of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API