State v. Anderson
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Sierra Anderson appeals the circuit court’s departure from presumptive probation. She contends that her sentence for a term of imprisonment violates her constitutional right to a jury trial because the court departed from presumptive probation based on facts that were neither found by a jury nor admitted by Anderson. We affirm.
Background
[¶ 2.] Sierra Anderson, who was 22 years of age at the time, sold three-quarters of a gram of methamphetamine to a confidential informant. After the sale, law enforcement executed a search warrant and found a remaining quarter of a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. OrrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. FeuchtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. FrinellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Woods v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.