Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Woods v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 24, 2017No. CASE NO. 1D15-4042Published

1ConcurrenceWinokur, J.

I agree with Judge Osterhaus’ concurring opinion that a departure sentence pursuant to section 775.082(10), Florida Statutes, does not implicate Apprendi10 and its progeny. However, even if a departure sentence did implicate Apprendi, I would find that section 775.082(10) is not facially unconstitutional because circumstances exist where it may be constitutionally applied.

I

Judge Osterhaus’ opinion notes that a defendant who qualifies under the first *820sentence of section 775.082(10) can be sentenced to as much as 364 days in jail followed by four years of community control or probation. In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Galindez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  5. Trushin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API