Woods v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1ConcurrenceWinokur, J.
I agree with Judge Osterhaus’ concurring opinion that a departure sentence pursuant to section 775.082(10), Florida Statutes, does not implicate Apprendi10 and its progeny. However, even if a departure sentence did implicate Apprendi, I would find that section 775.082(10) is not facially unconstitutional because circumstances exist where it may be constitutionally applied.
I
Judge Osterhaus’ opinion notes that a defendant who qualifies under the first *820sentence of section 775.082(10) can be sentenced to as much as 364 days in jail followed by four years of community control or probation. In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Galindez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Trushin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.