Rustad v. Baumgartner
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Tufte, Justice.
[¶1] Trevor Rustad appeals from the district court's judgment granting primary residential responsibility of his two children to their mother, Mary Baumgartner, and setting a parenting time plan for Rustad. He argues the district court's judgment was clearly erroneous because the court did not include in its analysis or findings evidence that was beneficial to him or detrimental to Baumgartner. We affirm the judgment granting primary residential responsibility to Baumgartner but reverse the parenting time plan and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I
[¶2]…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Deyle v. DeyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Dschaak v. DschaakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Molitor v. MolitorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Schrodt v. SchrodtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Lessard v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Edison v. EdisonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Lizakowski v. LizakowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Meuchel v. Red Trail EnergyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.