Legal Opinion

Catalano v. Hassett

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 31, 2018No. 17–P–1326Published

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, who leased premises owned by the defendants and operated a business known as Ice Cream Smuggler, appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), 365 Mass. 754 (1974).4 The plaintiffs allege that the defendants breached the lease by (1) refusing to honor the plaintiff's election to purchase the property, and (2) leasing the premises to a competitor. For the following reasons we affirm the judgment.

We review de novo the allowance of a motion to dismiss under rule 12(b)(6). See Curtis v. Herb Chambers I-95, Inc., 458 Mass. 674, 676 (2011).…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. United Truck Leasing Corp. v. GeltmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Curtis v. Herb Chambers I-95, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  5. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank v. VaradianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API