Legal Opinion

United States v. Hankton

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 28, 1990No. ACMR 8903553PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GIUNTINI, Judge: *

The appellant was placed in pretrial confinement on 15 September 1989 and was released by the military magistrate on 25 September 1989. The military judge ordered that the appellant be given credit for a total of thirteen days of pretrial confinement: ten days for ordinary pretrial confinement and three days because of the tardy magistrate’s review.1 The credit should have been for fourteen days. See United States v. Allen, 17 M.J. 126 (C.M.A.1984) (accused is entitled to day-for-day credit for time spent in pretrial confinement); United States v. New, 23…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  3. United States v. BallesterosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. DeLoatchU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  5. United States v. NewU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. StuartU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. United States v. SpencerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API