Legal Opinion

Matarese v. Dunham

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 27, 1997No. 95-741-AppealPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case came before the Supreme Court on January 22, 1997, pursuant to an order that directed the plaintiff, Joan A Matarese, and the defendants, the city of Providence (city), through its treasurer, Stephen T. Na-politano, and Victor F. Dunham (Dunham), to show cause why this appeal should not be summarily decided. The order identified “the correctness of [the Superior Court’s] exclusion of interest against the city” as the sole issue in the plaintiffs appeal.

After hearing the arguments of counsel and reviewing the memoranda filed by the parties, this Court concludes that cause has…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc./Franki Foundation Co. v. GillSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  2. Andrade v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  3. Catone v. MedberrySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  4. O'BRIEN v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  5. Lepore v. Rhode Island Public Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Daniel v. CrossSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  2. Housing Authority of Providence v. OropezaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  3. Donnelly v. Town of LincolnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  4. Andrade v. PerrySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  5. Feeney v. NapolitanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API