Bransford v. Regal Shoe Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Petition to Superintend and Revise from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas; Edward R. Meek, Judge. In the matter of the bankruptcy of Horrell & Criss. Petition for reclamation by the Regal Shoe Company, opposed by E. M. Bransford, trustee in bankruptcy. On certificate from the referee, an order denying the petition was reversed, and petition granted, whereupon E. M. Bransford, trustee, petitions to superintend and revise the order.
Read the full summary
Petition to Superintend and Revise from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas; Edward R. Meek, Judge. In the matter of the bankruptcy of Horrell & Criss. Petition for reclamation by the Regal Shoe Company, opposed by E. M. Bransford, trustee in bankruptcy. On certificate from the referee, an order denying the petition was reversed, and petition granted, whereupon E. M. Bransford, trustee, petitions to superintend and revise the order. The following is tire opinion of Meek, District Judge, in tire court below; Horrell & Criss, a mercantile corporation,…
1Per curiam
This case seems to have been correctly ruled and decided in the District Court. The petition to superintend and revise is denied.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Willard, Sutherland & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Vital v. KerrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Bartling Tire Co. v. CoxeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923