United States v. Deloyd Jones
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellants were convicted of a series of racketeering, drug, and firearm offenses-including several offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 924 -in connection with their activities as members of a New Orleans gang. While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court decided United States v. Davis , --- U.S. ----, 139 S. Ct. 2319 , 204 L.Ed.2d 757 (2019), which held that the residual clause of § 924(c) is unconstitutionally vague. Appellants now seek vacatur of their § 924 convictions. We VACATE the challenged convictions and REMAND.
I
Appellants Deloyd Jones, Byron Jones, and Sidney Patterson were convicted of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Antonio SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Mohamed SaidCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. CapersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- United States v. EldridgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- United States v. McClarenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.