Legal Opinion

Hartford Casualty Insurance v. MDI Construction, L.L.C.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided January 31, 2012No. Civil Action No. 10-4369Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

KURT D. ENGELHARDT, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiff/Defendanbin-Interpleader Hartford Casualty Insurance Company’s (“Hartford”) Motion for Payment of Contract Funds and Attorney’s Fees (Rec. Doc. 65). This motion is opposed by Defendanb-in-Interpleader Investar Bank (“Investar”) as to the payment of contract funds (Rec. Doc. 75) and by Plaintiff-in-Interpleader the Audubon Commission (“Audubon”) as to the payment of attorney’s fees (Rec. Doc. 76). Defendant in Interpleader the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) also filed a memorandum in response to the motion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. HovisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
Bierman v. MarcusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.