Legal Opinion

Crowley v. Nixon

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1931No. 29,763PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This action was originally brought to obtain a construction of a will. Later the action was broadened into an action of partition. The matter of interpretation of the instrument was first determined and the decision then made was brought to this *553court for a review. The will was made by Mary Nixon, who had seven children, and in it she gave her personal property as well as the proceeds of two city lots to her seven children in equal shares, and as to a farm owned by her she provided:

“I further give, devise and bequeath to my son, William…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rauen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Frazier v. JeakinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Alumbaugh v. HedgesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Judy v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. Crowley v. NixonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Windscheffel v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Hotchkiss v. FischerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. Vincent v. WernerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Watson v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Murray v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API