Legal Opinion

Richards v. Lawing

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1933No. 24525. En BancPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J.—

Claude W. Estes and wife owned a vacant lot in Seattle. They executed a warranty deed dated August 28, 1929, purporting to convey the lot to Paul C. Lawing. Under the same date, Lawing and wife made and delivered to Claude W. Estes their negotiable promissory note in the sum of eighteen hundred dollars, and secured the payment of it by a mortgage on the lot, dated and delivered on the same date.

It appears that the deed from Estes and wife to Lawing was neither delivered nor recorded at the date it was executed, but was held by Estes with the note and mortgage given to him by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. HelgesenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Foster v. Augustanna College & Theological SeminarySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Jenkins v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Coe v. WormellWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Landauer v. SublettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bremerton Creamery & Produce Co. v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Cunningham v. Norwegian Lutheran Church of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API