United States v. King
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FOREMAN, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted of committing indecent acts with a child and assault consummated by a battery in violation of Articles 134 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 934 and 928 (1976). His adjudged and approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for six months, total forfeitures and reduction to Private E-l.
After the court members received proper sentencing instructions from the military judge, they retired to deliberate. A sentence worksheet had been furnished to them to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. McCullahUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. GrayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. AllbeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. LinderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. HastonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. ThomasU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. MoreroNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994
- United States v. GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013