Legal Opinion

Le Duff v. Demoruelle

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1914No. 6031Published

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “E”, No. 104,140, lion. G-. H. Theard, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

His Honor, CHARLES F. CLAIBORNE,

rendered'the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

Plaintiff filed suit against A. S. Demoruelle and the National Surety Company for $283.20. He alleged that Hood & Co., contractors, had made a contract with Jurglewicz, owner, to erect certain buildings at a cost exceeding $1000.00, which contract was recorded in’ Book 1049 p. 654;

That the National Surety Company was the surety of said contractor for the payment of all subcontractors, workmen and furnishers of materials ;-

That petitioner is a painter by trade, and he was engaged by A. S. Demoruelle to do…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Davis v. Arkansas Southern R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. Louisiana Glass & Mirror Works, Ltd. v. IrwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  4. Hagerty v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  5. Widow & Heirs of Willis v. BerrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API