Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Bowlen
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 3, 1967PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.
The defendants were tried on an indictment for armed robbery. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as to each defendant. The case was tried subject to G. L. e. 278, §§ 33A-33G-, and is here by appeals. The defendant Gilday filed three assignments of error. The defendant Bowlen filed five assignments of error but argued only one of them. Those not argued are deemed waived.
1. The defendant Gilday first assigns as error the denial of his motion before trial for “Return of Seized Property and Suppression of Evidence.”
At the hearing on that motion the judge could have found the following facts.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- People v. GlaubmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- Commonwealth v. WilburMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Commonwealth v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.