Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Wilbur
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 7, 1967PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.
Wilbur was employed by the Commonwealth as a “natural resource officer.” See G. L. c. 21, §§ 1, 6, 6A-6E, as amended. He was convicted under nine 1 separate indictments for breaking and entering summer dwellings in the Plymouth and Wareham area with intent to commit larceny and for larceny. The trial was conducted under G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G, as amended. Wilbur appealed. Further facts are stated in connection with particular assignments of error.
1. Prior to trial Wilbur moved to suppress certain evidence obtained by searches which he claimed were “unreasonable and in violation of” his…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AntobenedettoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Commonwealth v. SandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- State v. DiRienzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Commonwealth v. BumpusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.