Legal Opinion

Schrunk v. Hawkins

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The sole question argued before us is whether the instructions to the jury, quoted in the preceding statement of facts, was purely abstract without application to any evidence in this case, or whether the record revealed a situation which rendered it proper. Neither party contends that the instruction misstated the law, but as previously indicated the plaintiff insists that the instruction was not applicable to any situation disclosed by the record.

Stating to the jury abstract propositions of law which are not applicable in any way to the issues which they are to determine, and which may tend…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. JenningsOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Ramp v. OsborneOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Anderson v. Wallowa National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Lewis v. CraftOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. West v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Austin v. Portland Traction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Snabel v. BarberOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Richanbach v. RubyOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Vandevert v. YoungsonOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Hyatt v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API