Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Saunders

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Cass. (Smith, J.) Case. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are-stated in the opinion, and in head-notes 5, 6, and 7.

1Opinion of the CourtS Tier wood, J.

This suit was commenced by declaration against the defendant, who was sheriff of Cass county, and contains two counts.

The first charges that the sheriff permitted one Patrick F. O’Neil to escape from his custody after having arrested him on a capias ad respondendum,, at the suit of the plaintiffs, whereby the “ plaintiffs have been and are greatly injured and delayed in the recovery of their debt” against O’Neil, “ and are likely to lose the same, * * * and have lost and been deprived of the means of recovering their costs- and charges” against him.

The second count alleges negligence in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Proctor v. ProutMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Sheridan v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. People ex rel. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance v. Judge of the Saginaw Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pratt v. Allegan Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Ahlrep v. HughesWyoming Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Clark v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Wright v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. McLeod v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API