Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Wickerham

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2012No. 2011-2032PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Michelle Wickerham, formerly of West Union, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0074984, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 2002. We suspended her license on an interim basis on April 29, 2011, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A), based upon allegations that she had engaged in conduct that violated the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct and that she posed a substantial threat of serious harm to the public. Disciplinary Counsel v. Wickerham, 128 Ohio St.3d 1469; 2011-Ohio-2052, 946 N.E.2d 229. And on November 16, 2011, we suspended her from the practice of law for her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. FernandezOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. WickerhamOhio Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Heather Marie KingerySupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. AnthonyOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. AnthonyOhio Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API