Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Wickerham

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 2011No. 2011-0551PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

On April 5, 2011, and pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5a)(A)(l)(b), relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed with this court a motion for interim remedial suspension pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5a), alleging that respondent, Michelle Wickerham, Attorney Registration No. 0074984, last known business address in West Union, Ohio, has engaged in conduct that violates the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct and that she poses a substantial threat of serious harm to the public. Respondent did not file a response.

Upon consideration thereof and pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5a)(B), it is ordered and decreed that an…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. WickerhamOhio Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API