Legal Opinion

Gardner v. City of Cape Girardeau

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 1994No. 65641PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Robert and Bernadette Gardner (“landowners”) filed suit for “common law damage/inverse condemnation” against the City of Cape Girardeau (“City”) for wrongful appropriation of their property because the City conducted a pre-condemnation survey. The trial court dismissed the petition with prejudice. However, it considered matters outside the pleadings. Landowners argue on appeal the trial court erred with respect to two points: 1) granting the City’s motion to dismiss since the trial court treated the motion as a summary judgment and summary judgment was not authorized; and 2)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. King General Contractors, Inc. v. Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day SaintsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Baker v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Counts v. Morrison-Knudsen, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Rhodes v. CrouchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Curnutt v. Scott Melvin Transport, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Shores v. Express Lending Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. City of Chesterfield v. Deshetler Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Chaney v. CooperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Williams v. GammonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API