Legal Opinion

Murray v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2010No. S162570Published

1Opinion of the Court

50 Cal.4th 860 (2010)

114 Cal. Rptr. 3d 241

237 P.3d 565

KEVIN MURRAY, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

ALASKA AIRLINES, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

No. S162570.

Supreme Court of California.

August 23, 2010.

Law Offices of James P. Stoneman II and James P. Stoneman II for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin, David J. Reis and Jason M. Habermeyer for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

BAXTER, J.

The doctrine of collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion,[1] is firmly embedded in both federal and California common law. It is grounded on the premise that "once an issue has been…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API