Legal Opinion

State v. Sepcich

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1986No. 85-KA-639PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISBAUM, Judge.

This appeal arises out of an illegal sentence. This Court previously affirmed the armed robbery conviction and remanded for resentencing. The defendant appeals from the resentencing. We affirm.

ISSUE

We are called upon to determine whether the trial court violated the defendant’s due process rights in its resentencing the defendant to 50 years hard labor without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence, where the previous illegal sentence was 50 years at hard labor, the first ten of which were to be without probation, parole, or suspension of sentence.

PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited9 opinions

North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
State v. FranksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
United States v. Simon HawthorneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
State v. SepcichLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

State v. SocoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
State v. GordonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
State v. ParkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
State v. GabrielLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
State v. HardanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.