Legal Opinion

Brown v. Smith Rouchon & Associates Inc

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided June 29, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00705Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION COLIN BROWN, individually, and } on behalf of all other similarly } situated consumers, } } Plaintiff, } Case No.: 2:19-cv-705-MHH } v. } } SMITH, ROUCHIN & } ASSOCIATES, INC., } } Defendant. } MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On behalf of himself and a purported class of similarly situated consumers, plaintiff Colin Brown asserts a claim against defendant Smith, Rouchon & Associates, Inc. under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Smith Rouchon has asked the Court to dismiss Mr. Brown’s FDCPA claim. (Doc. 8).1…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Speaker v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Disease Control & PreventionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API