Legal Opinion
Kungle v. Executive Officers, State Farm Insurance
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 16, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1338PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
The pro se plaintiff, Arthur Kungle, Jr., brings this action against his insurance provider, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”), and appears to allege that State Farm’s failure to pay his insurance claim violates 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985, and 1986 (2012). See generally ECF No. 1; ECF No. 9; ECF No. 10. 2 The plaintiff additionally alleges that State Farm committed criminal mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (2012). 3 See ECF No. 1 at 1. He seeks an award of $200,000 under his State Farm insurance…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arias v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Adetoro v. King Abdullah AcademyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Hand v. PerezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Laatiris v. Banque Centrale PopulaireDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Marquez v. PompeoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.