Legal Opinion
C. R. Klewin, Inc. v. Flagship Properties, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 10, 1991No. 14322PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The sole question before us in this certified appeal is whether the provision of the statute of *570frauds, General Statutes § 52-550 (a) (5),1 requiring a writing for an “agreement that is not to be performed within one year from the making thereof,” renders unenforceable an oral contract that fails to specify explicitly the time for performance when performance of that contract within one year of its making is exceedingly unlikely. This case comes to this court upon our grant of an application for certification from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit pursuant to General…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Landes Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Royal Bank of Canada, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Freedman v. Chemical Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- D & N Boening, Inc. v. Kirsch Beverages, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Petereit v. S.B. Thomas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Thomason v. Chemical BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- DK Arena, Inc. v. EB Acquisitions I, LLCSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Pagano v. IppolitiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Jacobs v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.