Louisville & N. R. v. Railroad Commission of Alabama
District Court, M.D. Alabama
In Equity. Suit by the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company against the Railroad Commission of Alabama and others. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
SHELBY, Circuit Judge.
This is a supplemental bill seeking to enjoin an order of the Railroad Commission of Alabama fixing intrastate. passenger rates.
[1] The application for an interlocutory injunction was made to the District Court on the ground that the order of the Alabama Railroad Commission is violative of the federal Constitution. The District Court (Hon. W. I. Grubb presiding), pursuant to the Act of March 4, 1913, c. 160, 37 Stat. 1013, amending section 266 of the Judicial Code (Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1162 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1911, p. 237]), called to liis assistance,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Bin LadenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Connecting Gas Co. v. ImesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1926
- Penna. R.R. Co. v. Public Ser. Com.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Co. v. City of Texarkana, Ark.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.