Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Connecting Gas Co. v. Imes

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 20, 1926No. 370PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESTENHAVER, District Judge.

This action is in equity against the county treasurers of five Ohio counties, seeking to enjoin the collection of certain taxes alleged to have been illegally assessed. The plaintiff is a public utility, as defined in section 614 — 2, Ohio Gen. Code. The property owned by it has been appraised and valued, and taxes thereon levied and assessed, by the tax commission of Ohio in the manner provided in sections 5420 to 5428. Upon filing its bill, plaintiff made an application for a preliminary injunction. The Ohio tax commission, by the Attorney General, has appeared…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Raymondv v. Chicago Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Arthur L. Tramel v. George SchraderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Tumulty v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. Lee v. RoseberryDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1950
  4. J. B. Schermerhorn, Inc. v. HollomanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  5. Henrietta Mills Co. v. Rutherford CountyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API