Legal Opinion
Compaq Computer Corp. v. Ergonome Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 28, 2001No. CIV.A.H-97-1026PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HARMON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in the above-referenced action is Plaintiff Compaq Computer Corporation’s (“Compaq”) Memorandum in Opposition to Ergonome’s Supplemental Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Inst. No. 274). To the extent the Court reads Plaintiffs opposition to Defendant’s partial summary judgment motion as itself a motion for partial summary judgment, the Court concludes that such motion should be DENIED.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In this Memorandum Order and Opinion, the Court is asked to go down yet another dark corridor in the long…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kid Stuff Marketing, Inc. v. Creative Consumer Concepts, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2016