Legal Opinion
Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Sohio Petroleum Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1948No. Docket No. 75, Calendar No. 43,844PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.
Under an order of the Michigan public service commission, entered June 18, 1946, in conformity with the provisions of Act No. 9, Pub. Acts 1929 (2 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 11632-11651 [Stat. Ann. §§ 22.1311-22.1330] B hereinafter referred to as Act. No. 9, the plaintiff is á common purchaser of natural gas from certain sections in Garfield and Freeman townships in Clare county and Orient and Sylvan townships in Osceola county, hereinafter called the Garfield-Orient field, in and from which it owns and operates a gathering and transmission pipe line.
Defendant Sohio Petroleum Company is the owner…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railroad v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- State v. Manhattan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Murphy v. Standard Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- City of Sioux Falls v. CollinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
- Pere Marquette Railroad v. United States Gypsum Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Oliver v. Kalamazoo Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1973
- Eakman v. RobbNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Nebinger v. Maryland Cas. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Dome Pipeline Corp. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- First Student, Inc., V State Of Wa Dept Of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.