People v. Heredia
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Judge RUSSEL
dissenting.
In October 2002, the trial court modified Heredia’s sentence to conform to the views expressed in People v. Luther, 43 P.3d 660 (Colo.App.2001) {Luther I). In December 2003, the court corrected Heredia’s sentence to conform to People v. Luther, 58 P.3d 1013 (Colo.2002) {Luther II).
Heredia now contends that the trial court lacked authority to issue the December 2003 order. Our resolution of his contention depends on how we answer two subsidiary questions:
1. When the trial court modified Here-dia’s sentence in October 2002, did the order result in an illegal sentence?
*10472. If…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- White v. PearlmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- In Re MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Ekberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- People v. LutherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.