Legal Opinion

State v. McMillan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 31, 1971No. 7112SC87PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDEICK, Judge.

The defendant contends that when the evidence is considered in the light most favorable to the State it fails to disclose that his failure to adequately support his five children was wilful, and that his motion for judgment as of nonsuit ought to have been allowed.

In State v. Hall, 251 N.C. 211, 110 S.E. 2d 868 (1959), Parker, J., later C.J., stated:

“In a prosecution under G.S. 14-322 the failure by a defendant to provide adequate support for his child must be wilful, that is, he intentionally and without just cause or excuse *736does not provide adequate support for his child…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People of Michigan v. Selesa Arrosieur LikineMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Burris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People of Michigan v. Selesa Arrosieur LikineMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People of Michigan v. Selesa Arrosieur LikineMichigan Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API