Legal Opinion
State v. McMillan
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided March 31, 1971No. 7112SC87PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEDEICK, Judge.
The defendant contends that when the evidence is considered in the light most favorable to the State it fails to disclose that his failure to adequately support his five children was wilful, and that his motion for judgment as of nonsuit ought to have been allowed.
In State v. Hall, 251 N.C. 211, 110 S.E. 2d 868 (1959), Parker, J., later C.J., stated:
“In a prosecution under G.S. 14-322 the failure by a defendant to provide adequate support for his child must be wilful, that is, he intentionally and without just cause or excuse *736does not provide adequate support for his child…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
3Cited by4 opinions
- People of Michigan v. Selesa Arrosieur LikineMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Burris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- People of Michigan v. Selesa Arrosieur LikineMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- People of Michigan v. Selesa Arrosieur LikineMichigan Supreme Court · 2012