Legal Opinion
Hinkley v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided August 26, 2004No. 03-03-00494-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOB PEMBERTON, Justice.
Dr. Bruce Stanton Hinkley appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the decision of appellee, the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners (the “Board”), to revoke his license to practice medicine. Hinkley asserts by several specific issues that the Board’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence, was arbitrary and capricious, was affected by other errors of law, and violated Hinkley’s constitutional or statutory rights. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
BACKGROUND
In 1989, after acknowledging that he was addicted to cocaine, Hinkley…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Texas Health Facilities Commission v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- County of Reeves v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- Webworld Marketing Group, L.L.C. v. Thomas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- County of Reeves v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Town of Pecos City, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- County of Reeves v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Town of Pecos City, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- David L. Andrews v. Texas Department of Health, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.