Legal Opinion

Harold Moorstein & Co., Inc. v. Excelsior Ins. Co. of Syracuse

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The affidavits submitted on the motion for summary judgment were unanimous as to the intent of the parties to the assignment. Hence, there was no issue of fact to be determined and summary judgment was proper. However, we note that the dictum in the opinion below, interpreting Stathos v. Murphy (26 A D 2d 500, affd. 19 N Y 2d 883) to give the assignee of proceeds of a claim priority over attaching lienors, is clearly incorrect. As was pointed out in the opinion in Stathos (at pp. 503-504), the assignment of after-acquired…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ppg Industries, Inc. v. The Hartford Fire Insurance Company, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. MDC Leasing Corp. v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  3. PPG Industries, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  4. United States v. Colby AcademyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  5. MacOndo's Profit Corp. v. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API