Legal Opinion
MacOndo's Profit Corp. v. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 8, 1994No. 92 Civ. 4522 (RLC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Defendant, Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc. (“Motorola”), seeks to dismiss this cause of action pursuant to Rule 12(c), F.R.Civ.P., because plaintiff, Macon-do’s Profit Corporation (“Macondo”), lacks standing. Plaintiff moves, pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1), F.R.Civ.P., for relief from two previous orders of the court, dated June 24 and July 7, 1993 (the “Orders”), which preclude plaintiff from introducing into evidence certain documents and testimony.
I
On January 3, 1989, Hector Santana entered into an agreement entitled “Amendment to Bill of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Aaron Ferer & Sons Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Matthew Madonna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- In the Matter of Hygrade Envelope Corp., Bankrupt. Samuel S. Baranow, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Hygrade Envelope Corp. v. Gibraltar Factors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- DeSantis v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- In re Progressive Wall Paper Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Haag v. MVP Health CareDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
- ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation (North America), Inc. v. National Railroad PassengerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- In re Motors Liquidation Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015