Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Whitlock

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 2003No. D041020PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

Following a court trial, Anthony Lee Whitlock was adjudged to be a sexually violent predator (SVP) within the meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code sections 6600 et seq. 1 , the Sexually Violent Predators Act (SVPA). The trial court ordered Whitlock committed to the custody of the Department of Mental Health for a period of two years.

Whitlock appeals, contending he is not an SVP because he did not have the requisite qualifying prior convictions.

We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On May 16, 2001, the District Attorney of San Diego County filed a petition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. MercerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. People v. Superior Court (Johannes)California Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. People v. ChamblessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. CarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Bawa v. TerhuneCalifornia Superior Court · 2019
  3. People v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. People v. WhitneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Arocho v. California Fair Plan InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API