Legal Opinion · Dissent

Virginia Partners, Ltd. v. Day

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 18, 1987No. 86-CA-0375-MRPublished

1DissentMcDONALD, Judge

I disagree with the majority’s holding that the individual appellants comprising partners in Virginia Partners, Ltd., are entitled to the privileges afforded to limited partners under the statutory scheme in either this state or Florida. The majority seems to have accepted exclusively the view expressed in Vulcan Furniture Manufacturing Corp. v. Vaughn, supra at 764, that the purpose of statutes relating to limited partnerships is to “encourage investing by parties having capital” and “not to assist creditors” including, presumably, those tortiously injured. While encouraging capital…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoefer v. HallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Rodgers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API