Legal Opinion

Georgouses v. NaTec Resources, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 20, 1997No. 96 C 4923PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GETTLEMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Phillip P. Gourgouses, derivatively on behalf of the shareholders of NaTec Resources, Inc. (“NaTec”) and individually and as a representative of a class of minority shareholders of NaTec, has brought a six count complaint against NaTec, CRSS, Inc., and Bruce W. Wilkinson, Timothy R. Dunne, and John T. McCormack. All defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to name indispensable parties, lack of personal jurisdiction over the individual defendants, and failure to state a claim. Those motions were fully briefed.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Helfant v. Louisiana & Southern Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1979
  3. Coats Co., Inc. v. Vulcan Equipment Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
  4. Van Gelder v. TaylorDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  5. Polin v. Conductron CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Saleh v. Titan Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2005
  2. Gueorguiev v. Max Rave, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  3. In Re Triton Ltd. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1999
  4. Boyd v. SnyderDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
  5. Berenson v. NATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API