Legal Opinion

Maddox v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 17, 1972PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OSBORNE, Justice.

Appellants, Billy Maddox and Jimmy Maddox, were convicted of stealing cattle and sentenced to two years in the penitentiary. They were tried jointly and this appeal is on behalf of both. As to both appellants the main contentions for reversal of the judgment are that the search was unlawful and sans the fruits of the search the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. We have examined the record and are of the opinion that the plain view doctrine is applicable to the facts presented here and the search was legal. See Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57, 44 S.Ct. 445,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maddox v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API